Friday, June 26, 2009

MJ syndrome

The newspapers, the television channels, the internet: today MJ is all over. There is shock, grief, and a standing ovation for the king of pop's swan song. Newspapers have written sympathetic paeans on the rise and rise of the moonwalker, who then got sucked into a quagmire of controversies.
However, one newspaper has not mentioned MJ's death on the front page. I was surprised, but also shocked that it did not mention the pop icon, who revolutionised the concept of music videos; the man who made the common man in India stand up and say, “I listen to western music”.
Kolkata's Telegraph is the paper I am referring to. Instead of the news of MJ’s death, it carried a story on how the Kolkata western music lovers hated to be associated with MJ's genre of music.
But my shock/surprise turned into a feeling of admiration, and then introspection for its content. Admiration because it captured the mood of the elite “rock bands” of the times. Also because the paper risked its readership, risked not covering MJ’s death the way other newspapers have.
Introspection, because it clearly reflected the duality, snobbery or even hypocrisy in me as a teenager or youth.
There was this English-speaking, Yes Prime Minister-watching, party-going youth living in Kolkata’s posh addresses (read Southern Avenue/Ballygunge), listening to Bach and Beethoven for their classical cravings, and turning to Beatles, Elvis, Bread, America and Floyd to whet their rock appetite.
And, then there was this Hum Log-Buniyaad-watching "other group, who got smitten by the “pop” bug when Doordarshan brought Beat It to their drawing rooms when it first telecast the Grammy awards ceremony live. This was the "Western Music" for them, having been fed with Bappi Lahiri and Lakshmikant-Pyerlal genre of Hindi music. And, they lapped it up.
Western music as a concept had been restricted to the LP records adorning the shelves of the elite, the self-styled music connoisseurs, for whom MJ was an anathema. They were the beautiful people, who wore branded jeans (attracting eyeballs), danced and drank in parties, made more friends, and got invited to more parties, and generally lead an “enviable, fun-filled” life.
That was how I, representing a middle-of-the-road group, felt. The group which never belonged to either sides!
I was unable to get away from the easy availability of Hindi film songs, being fed with that genre of music at the formative years of my life. So there were no Beatles, Bach, rock, folk or country, till I "discovered" Cliff Richards and his Summer Holidays. The western music bug bit me too. Suddenly, I had to belong. I had to be seen listening to English songs, like the elite party goers, like those who shunned Hindi film songs. So I started listening to the weekly programme on radio, Musical Band Box, for my initiation. I realised I had half-arrived. The other half, only when I was to be invited to parties. And, that never happened during my school-college days!!!
Then Beatles, Floyd, America, Bread flocked my shelves, vying for attention with hits of Amitabh Bachchan, Rajesh Khanna and even Mithun Chakraborty.
But I was in the middle. I was not really into the English music circuit. I was still secretly (honestly that is the word) listening to latest Hindi film songs. After all, how can I get out of that diet that I had been fed with? I too shunned MJ, and his genre of music. Like Wham, or Boy George and Culture Club. I felt I shouldn’t be discussing MJ, who had stormed into the psyche of the masses. The hoi polloi had rejected MJ as too down-market. And, sadly, I became a ``me-too”.
On hindsight, I feel I had been so immature, so hypocritical. Like a worm that tried to be butterfly, a duckling desperate to be seen as a swan.
A few peacock feathers cannot make a peacock out of a crow. That was what I was trying to be.
On hindsight, I feel I lost my youth in this constant search for being noticed, to belong. What a waste of youth. Now I am trying to see things honestly. Like being proud to say “I love Sholay and Amitabh Bachchan”. Saying this then would have made me a stronger, but most important, an honest youth.

5 comments:

  1. I thoroughly enjoyed the post. I agree and disagree with certain points though. Firstly, as an urban Indian from a middle class background in the 80s and early 90s, we had a very good variety to choose from in the musicscape. There was no culture of western music in my school. However, in a very small group of friends sharing common musical sensibilities, we would debate massively about Naushad's choice of Rafi for a song or wonder about giving more credence to Sahir or S.D.Burman in Pyaasa. Mind you, in class 8 or 9, it was not really "cool" to listen to these either. We were way out of times in terms of music interests. It was pure passion for Naushad, Ravi, SDB and the likes that prevented us from jumping to the buffet of Bappi Lahiri, Nadeem Shravan or Michael Jackson or Metallica.

    Interestingly, fondness for Indian classical music and rock music had its birth in Naushad and Pancham. Our ears had got tuned differently by the time we discovered western music. For western sounds, we rather resorted to the real sounds of Jethro Tull, Paul Simon or Allman Brothers. Flat 80s Hindi film music, the nasal torture of Kumar Sanu, the electronic jugglery of MJ or the heavy metal noise of Iron Maiden were all equally unpalatable to us.

    --Rajendran

    ReplyDelete
  2. To pick up where Raj left, the issue is temporal at one level, access to western music in the 80s was restricted to a certain elite by way of education or wealth. And appreciation of western music and movies reinforced those class distinctions. Everyone wanted to be part of this elite class. Now with all the globalization and all that jazz, everyone with access to cheap internet can simply watch or listen to almost anything on the globe he wants irrespective of his social standing. The snobbery perhaps has been reduced a bit.
    Second from an individualistic point, we need to expand our cultural horizons. Watching Yes minister and Arrested development no way diminishes our cultural identity. It is akin to stopping a Keralite from appreciating Urdu. This is another cultural bridge so to speak. We just need to open our minds to new experiences.
    Finally we need to find our personal cultural sweet spots and fight the need to belong in every group. Having said that our cultural sweet spots themselves are not static and would evolve over time.
    Suggested readings:
    >M N Srinivas's essay on Sanskritisation for thoughts on Group identities
    >Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat"- The chapter on Internet as a flattener.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In fact, analysing this east-west music-movie divide and the eventual class distinction it evolved, I realised how this exclusivity got blurred post '91.The internet made accessibility to cross cultural exchanges easier.
    I agree there is a need to expand our cultural horizan, and understand and appreciate an Arrested Development or Sine Field. In fact, today, I would no care about people calling me a snob for terming the Indian soaps/comedy shows an insult to our intelligence. Well, they are. Indian TV soap makers have not thought beyond the themes of Dynasty-or Bold and Beautiful.
    We also have to keep in mind the fact that it is rather fashionable today, or cool to say "I like Indian music and movies". With India and Indians getting corporatised and the way the West is looking at us, it has been a moral booster for the Indian confidence. And this is egging the Indian to explore and appreciate our cultural space.
    India's bold economic strides has in a way shaped the Indian psyche to be proud of its culture.
    cheers

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is a question of maturing with age. It's not about conforming to other people's opinions or not having one of our own. Just that we were ignorant or not well informed to appreciate the beauty in something. Like 10 years ago I don't think I would have appreciated a carnatic concert or 10 years ago, I might have appreciated the Backstreet Boys for all you know! There is nothing really to be ashamed of here. And I think only after that comes access to a genre of music etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. C'est brilliant....You capture the mindset of the 70's teenager perfectly. I remember the look of horror and disdain on the face of one of my Xavier's mates, when I told him I liked Boney M's Daddy Cool (which I still do !). I remember the endless arguments with my Dad on the Abba vs Bhimsen Joshi subject...in retrospect he won the argument. I have the complete collection of Bhimsen Joshi today...none of Abba !

    ReplyDelete