There have been a surfeit of columns branding the Lok Pal committee as anti-democratic as it will be peopled by civil activists other than our elected leaders; that the movement had been fed and fuelled by “Left” sympathisers as if they were to be avoided like plague; that it had gained momentum following the West Asia crisis or revolution (depending on the side of coin you wish to see); that Anna Hazare had to be blamed for having blackmailed the government into setting up such a watchdog as it will comprise civilians apart from elected politicians. One column said Mahatma Gandhi used Satyagraha to humble the despotic/autocratic colonial rule, and Anna Hazare should not have approached our democratically elected government with this approach.
The movement has indeed inspired the tweeting-texting middle class Indians to rally behind Hazare, apart from the Bollywood brigade. I choose to toss the Bollywood support out of the multiplex’ revolving glass doors because I do not think I want to take their multiple roles too seriously. They are certainly not our role models; they can remain in the reels.
Columnists have doled out solutions like cleaning up our system; the fact is we have three democratic sensors: the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, and a fourth conscientious one: the Press. We have seen how our Parliament and Assemblies function. Chairs are hurled, paper rockets fly across; ministers almost come to blows, and finally, wad of notes makes a mockery of the electoral process. Precious work hours are lost, and policy decisions take a back seat. The less said the better about the media screaming for attention with its innovative (read business savvy) ways of catching the eyeballs. So when Hazare went on fast, the channels began an SMS campaign. The great Indian middle class fell into the trap, hook, line and sinker, texting messages of solidarity from their touch screen mobiles or newly-acquired i-pads. The biggest gainers were the mobile service providers and the news channels, who share the spoils of the message revenue. The immaturity of the India electronic media is so stark; we have news anchors spilling out emotions, rather than acting objectively.
In India, a cleaning up of a system has not been possible so far. We have stepped into the sixth decade, and the system only stinks. The income gaps have widened, corporate-politician nexus has strengthened; elections have become an over-the-counter service with take television sets/sarees and stamp on symbol in return; poll alliances have become a joke, making strange bedfellows and sleeping partners. No one seems to be awake in this system, except a few consciences in the judiciary; I repeat only a few of them. Everything and everyone is up for sale, up for grabs..from the traffic policemen to those in the portals of power.
We needed this mass hysteria to at least shake off the lethargy, and transform drawing room frustrations into candle light vigils. Anna Hazare did not do this to end corruption; he merely stirred us out of our slumber, or of helplessness.
India is a land of icon-lovers. We need an icon to worship and that explains why we have made our cricket players and filmstars gods. That explains the statue culture or statue diplomacy of our politicians, whether it is a Mayawati or a Shivaji, a Netaji or a Basava. Or the cut-out culture of the south, where endless litres of milk are poured on the larger-than-life canvas images of Rajnikath.
Then why is a Tamil filmstar, whether it is MGR or Rajnikanth, elevated to that super-human status by their supporters, despite growing under the shadow of an iconoclast like Periyar of the Dravidian movement? The reason is simple: we Indians cutting across linguistic state boundaries are used to worshipping an entity. So when Periyar destroyed the idea of idol-worship, they resorted to worshipping human beings, elevating them to the status of Gods.
Let us admit, we Indians are yet to mature into a powerful democratic force powered by intellectual exposure. We are immature, illiterate, in awe of public figures, and therefore, needed an Anna Hazare as our conscience-keeper to tell us not to take corruption lying down.
Hazare only won a minor skirmish for us. The war still remains to be fought.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The bigger problem here is the "immaturity of the electronic media" that you mention. No one is even bothered to look at the whole thing from a different point of view. A lot of people supporting LokPal Bill and Anna Hazare haven't even read the bill in its entirety. For example, this one by P Sainath was spot on I felt. And no one, in the TV media at least, is willing to discuss the aspects he touches upon:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qfAyDVogxc
I do like the tone and beat of your piece. What irks me is that it's the middle class that engages willingly or unwillingly in the process of regular corruption and it is that same class that suddenly feels like being part of this. It's a kind of hypocrisy that they(we) exhibit. The placard of a 'Gandhian' pulls people to the fore. I wonder why!
ReplyDeleteI'd like to bring to your attention this wonderful piece about Irom Sharmila who has been crusading the exact same battle, but alas, she is not from the heart of India. She belongs to a backyard called Manipur and hence goes unnoticed. If it takes a paradoxical Narendra Modi loving Gandhian to stir up a nation, it just speaks volumes of a scared, bigot and sterile middle class. Although, I like the fact that people are atleast half awake, I wish, they were fully so.
Dr. Binayak Sen being released is a great and exciting moment for us but at the same time, the totalitarian form of oppression by the state is scary. Millions of nameless Dalits are still stuck in jails. Are there lawyers to bail them out? A skewed democracy, if you will!
I forgot to attach the piece I was talking about.
ReplyDeletehttp://situationsasia.com/story/tale-two-gandhians-anna-hazare-and-irom-sharmila